atom feed24 messages in net.launchpad.lists.openstackRe: [Openstack] [Openstack-operators]...
FromSent OnAttachments
Thierry CarrezApr 27, 2012 3:04 am 
Daniel P. BerrangeApr 27, 2012 3:46 am 
Jim MeyeringApr 27, 2012 4:11 am 
Monty TaylorApr 27, 2012 5:41 am 
Monty TaylorApr 27, 2012 5:46 am 
Duncan McGreggorApr 27, 2012 6:44 am 
Monty TaylorApr 27, 2012 8:26 am 
Duncan McGreggorApr 27, 2012 8:31 am 
Stefano MaffulliApr 27, 2012 9:33 am 
Everett ToewsApr 27, 2012 12:52 pm 
Matt JoyceApr 27, 2012 2:33 pm 
Duncan McGreggorApr 27, 2012 2:42 pm 
Stefano MaffulliApr 27, 2012 5:59 pm 
Jim MeyeringApr 28, 2012 2:45 pm 
Everett ToewsApr 30, 2012 9:12 am 
Stefano MaffulliApr 30, 2012 10:08 am 
Everett ToewsApr 30, 2012 11:00 am 
Duncan McGreggorApr 30, 2012 11:06 am 
Matt RayApr 30, 2012 11:37 am 
Jan van EldikMay 1, 2012 1:13 pm 
Duncan McGreggorMay 11, 2012 1:12 pm 
Duncan McGreggorMay 11, 2012 1:20 pm 
Duncan McGreggorMay 17, 2012 8:40 am 
Duncan McGreggorMay 17, 2012 8:46 am 
Subject:Re: [Openstack] [Openstack-operators] Mailing-list split
From:Stefano Maffulli (stef@openstack.org)
Date:Apr 27, 2012 5:59:30 pm
List:net.launchpad.lists.openstack

On Fri 27 Apr 2012 02:43:14 PM PDT, Duncan McGreggor wrote:

But if openstack-operators has become a property valuable to community members, we shouldn't just get rid of it because it doesn't make logical sense. We should make sure that folks are ready to transition to another location for their DevOps needs.

I agree with this approach: let's cross that bridge when we come to it. We should make one small change at the time, measure/evaluate and keep changing as needed.

thanks, stef