|Thierry Carrez||Apr 27, 2012 3:04 am|
|Daniel P. Berrange||Apr 27, 2012 3:46 am|
|Jim Meyering||Apr 27, 2012 4:11 am|
|Monty Taylor||Apr 27, 2012 5:41 am|
|Monty Taylor||Apr 27, 2012 5:46 am|
|Duncan McGreggor||Apr 27, 2012 6:44 am|
|Monty Taylor||Apr 27, 2012 8:26 am|
|Duncan McGreggor||Apr 27, 2012 8:31 am|
|Stefano Maffulli||Apr 27, 2012 9:33 am|
|Everett Toews||Apr 27, 2012 12:52 pm|
|Matt Joyce||Apr 27, 2012 2:33 pm|
|Duncan McGreggor||Apr 27, 2012 2:42 pm|
|Stefano Maffulli||Apr 27, 2012 5:59 pm|
|Jim Meyering||Apr 28, 2012 2:45 pm|
|Everett Toews||Apr 30, 2012 9:12 am|
|Stefano Maffulli||Apr 30, 2012 10:08 am|
|Everett Toews||Apr 30, 2012 11:00 am|
|Duncan McGreggor||Apr 30, 2012 11:06 am|
|Matt Ray||Apr 30, 2012 11:37 am|
|Jan van Eldik||May 1, 2012 1:13 pm|
|Duncan McGreggor||May 11, 2012 1:12 pm|
|Duncan McGreggor||May 11, 2012 1:20 pm|
|Duncan McGreggor||May 17, 2012 8:40 am|
|Duncan McGreggor||May 17, 2012 8:46 am|
|Subject:||Re: [Openstack] [Openstack-operators] Mailing-list split|
|From:||Everett Toews (ever...@cybera.ca)|
|Date:||Apr 30, 2012 11:00:45 am|
I was replying to Duncan's email, not Thierry's. I'm all for the new openstack-dev list.
It was Duncan's proposal that the other lists be split as so.
1. openstack-dev = Dev 2. openstack = Ops 3. openstack-operators = DevOps
I am questioning the necessity to have both lists 2 and 3. My proposal boils down to the question, does the DevOps community really need its own list?
I'm willing to wait until the next Summit to see what the traffic numbers are like on the openstack and openstack-operators lists before any decisions are made around merging them or keeping them separate. However, I still think it's worthwhile to ask the question above.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Stefano Maffulli <stef...@openstack.org>wrote:
On Mon 30 Apr 2012 09:12:24 AM PDT, Everett Toews wrote:
It's strange to me that we would take the existing mailing list openstack-operators and move the Ops people on it to the openstack list and repurpose the openstack-operators for DevOps people.
I'm lost here, I don't understand what you're proposing to do.
Thierry framed the problem:
The traffic on the open...@lists.launchpad.net list doubled in the last 4 months , with more users and deployers asking for information on OpenStack projects.
And he made a proposa to split between:
1/ Usage, deployment, Essex / current-stable discussions 2/ Development, contribution, Folsom / forward-looking discussions
A new list will be created for (2) and existing contributors will be asked to subscribe to that new list
He said nothing about point 1. I assumed that openstack-operators is one of the place for discussions around usage, deployment and such (another place for that is the forum).
It seems to me there there is consensus to keep openstack-operators and forums running therefore I'll ask Todd to review the openstack.org/community pages (and the top navigation bar) in order to make these landing destinations more prominent.