|Thierry Carrez||Apr 27, 2012 3:04 am|
|Daniel P. Berrange||Apr 27, 2012 3:46 am|
|Jim Meyering||Apr 27, 2012 4:11 am|
|Monty Taylor||Apr 27, 2012 5:41 am|
|Monty Taylor||Apr 27, 2012 5:46 am|
|Duncan McGreggor||Apr 27, 2012 6:44 am|
|Monty Taylor||Apr 27, 2012 8:26 am|
|Duncan McGreggor||Apr 27, 2012 8:31 am|
|Stefano Maffulli||Apr 27, 2012 9:33 am|
|Everett Toews||Apr 27, 2012 12:52 pm|
|Matt Joyce||Apr 27, 2012 2:33 pm|
|Duncan McGreggor||Apr 27, 2012 2:42 pm|
|Stefano Maffulli||Apr 27, 2012 5:59 pm|
|Jim Meyering||Apr 28, 2012 2:45 pm|
|Everett Toews||Apr 30, 2012 9:12 am|
|Stefano Maffulli||Apr 30, 2012 10:08 am|
|Everett Toews||Apr 30, 2012 11:00 am|
|Duncan McGreggor||Apr 30, 2012 11:06 am|
|Matt Ray||Apr 30, 2012 11:37 am|
|Jan van Eldik||May 1, 2012 1:13 pm|
|Duncan McGreggor||May 11, 2012 1:12 pm|
|Duncan McGreggor||May 11, 2012 1:20 pm|
|Duncan McGreggor||May 17, 2012 8:40 am|
|Duncan McGreggor||May 17, 2012 8:46 am|
|Subject:||Re: [Openstack] [Openstack-operators] Mailing-list split|
|From:||Matt Ray (ma...@opscode.com)|
|Date:||Apr 30, 2012 11:37:13 am|
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Duncan McGreggor <dun...@dreamhost.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Everett Toews <ever...@cybera.ca> wrote:
I was replying to Duncan's email, not Thierry's. I'm all for the new openstack-dev list.
It was Duncan's proposal that the other lists be split as so.
1. openstack-dev = Dev 2. openstack = Ops 3. openstack-operators = DevOps
I think adding the "openstack-dev" list will help alleviate traffic on "openstack", but we should keep 3 mailing lists. The "openstack" one will probably continue to be a mix of traffic, and as new community members become more familiar with the mailing list landscape they'll move to the proper lists (with gentle encouragement as well). With more visibility and encouragement, more focused operations questions will get to the proper "openstack-operators" list in the future (likewise -dev). I don't expect mailing list traffic to decrease in the future, so reducing the number of mailing lists seems unnecessary.
Thanks, Matt Ray Senior Technical Evangelist | Opscode Inc. ma...@opscode.com | (512) 731-2218 Twitter, IRC, GitHub: mattray
To be clear, my proposal is to see how the devops community feels about this, before deciding it's a good idea, without their input.
I am questioning the necessity to have both lists 2 and 3. My proposal boils down to the question, does the DevOps community really need its own list?
As soon as it's clear that *everyone* feels this way, we should do it. Until then, we should not make decisions that impact the community (e.g., taking something away that may be valueable to some) without getting their feedback and finding some way transition in a way that keeps everyone happy.
I'm willing to wait until the next Summit to see what the traffic numbers are like on the openstack and openstack-operators lists before any decisions are made around merging them or keeping them separate.
However, I still think it's worthwhile to ask the question above.
_______________________________________________ Openstack-operators mailing list Open...@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators